It was July 2013. The sun was out in San Francisco, but at SFO, things were turning into a nightmare. Asiana Flight 214 had just clipped the seawall. Debris was everywhere. Smoke rose from the fuselage. It was a tragedy that resulted in three deaths and dozens of injuries. But just six days after the crash, something happened that turned a somber international news story into one of the most infamous blunders in the history of live television.
You probably remember the names. Sum Ting Wong. Wi Tu Lo. Ho Lee Fuk. Bang Ding Ow.
KTVU, a local Fox affiliate in the Bay Area, aired these names during a noon broadcast, claiming they were the pilots of the downed Boeing 777. The anchor, Tori Campbell, read them with complete confidence. No hesitation. No realization that she was reading a series of phonetic puns mocking Asian names. It was a moment that burned itself into the collective memory of the internet, spawning endless memes while simultaneously sparking a massive debate about racism, newsroom ethics, and the speed of the digital age.
The Noon Broadcast That Changed Everything
Honesty is key here: seeing it live was surreal. You expect a certain level of vetting from a major news station. KTVU wasn't some tiny blog; they were a respected outlet. Yet, there they were, displaying a graphic with four names that were clearly—in hindsight—racist pranks.
The station's mistake wasn't just a typo. It was a systemic failure of "fact-checking" that basically let a prankster’s joke bypass every single gatekeeper in the newsroom. They claimed an NTSB intern confirmed the names.
They were right about the intern, but wrong about the authority.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) eventually had to issue a massive apology. They admitted a summer intern had "acted outside the scope of his authority" by confirming these fake names to the station. Imagine being that intern. One minute you're getting coffee or filing paperwork, and the next, you've helped orchestrate an international incident that offended millions of people and led to lawsuits.
📖 Related: The Galveston Hurricane 1900 Orphanage Story Is More Tragic Than You Realized
Why the Hoax Worked (and Why It Fails)
It worked because of the rush. Newsrooms are pressure cookers. When you have a breaking story like a plane crash, everyone wants to be first. Everyone wants the "exclusive" details. In the race to be first, KTVU forgot to be right.
The names themselves are a crude form of wordplay:
- Sum Ting Wong (Something Wrong)
- Wi Tu Lo (We Too Low)
- Ho Lee Fuk (Holy F***)
- Bang Ding Ow (The sound of a crash)
It’s dark humor. Maybe it’s the kind of thing you’d see on a 2004 message board, but on a 2013 news broadcast? It felt like a glitch in the matrix. The irony is that the actual pilots—Lee Kang-kook and Lee Jung-min—were fighting for their lives and the lives of their passengers. Using their tragedy as a punchline wasn't just a mistake; for many, it was a sign of deep-seated cultural insensitivity that still exists in Western media.
The Fallout for KTVU and the NTSB
The consequences were swift. KTVU fired at least three producers over the incident. They issued apologies on air and online. Asiana Airlines even threatened to sue the station for defamation, arguing that the broadcast damaged their reputation (though they eventually dropped the suit to focus on the crash investigation itself).
But the damage to the "brand" of journalism was already done.
The NTSB intern was let go immediately. It’s a classic example of how a single person in a low-level position can cause a catastrophic PR nightmare if there aren't enough "check-and-balance" layers in place.
👉 See also: Why the Air France Crash Toronto Miracle Still Changes How We Fly
The Cultural Impact of the Meme
Funny enough, the Sum Ting Wong incident didn't just disappear. It became a permanent fixture of internet culture. If you go on Reddit or X (formerly Twitter) today, you’ll still see people referencing it whenever a news station makes a blunder. It’s the "gold standard" for what happens when the media gets it wrong.
However, there is a darker side to the meme. For many in the AAPI (Asian American and Pacific Islander) community, the joke wasn't funny. It was a reminder that their identities are often reduced to phonetic gags. The fact that an entire newsroom looked at those names and didn't see anything suspicious suggests a "blind spot" that is frankly hard to wrap your head around in a city as diverse as San Francisco.
Was it malice? Probably not. It was likely just extreme incompetence and a lack of diversity in the room. If one person in that production chain had been familiar with the tropes of anti-Asian racism, they would have flagged it in a heartbeat.
Lessons in Fact-Checking for the Modern Era
We live in a world where AI-generated fake news and "deepfakes" are everywhere. The KTVU incident was a low-tech version of what we face now. It was a human-generated prank that exploited a human desire for speed.
If you're a content creator, a journalist, or even just someone sharing news on social media, there are a few things we can take away from this disaster:
- The "Too Good to Be True" Rule: If you get a "scoop" that feels a little too perfect or a little too weird, it probably is.
- Verify the Source, Not Just the Info: The NTSB intern "confirmed" the names, but he wasn't authorized to do so. Just because someone answers the phone at a government agency doesn't mean they are a spokesperson.
- Read It Out Loud: Honestly, if the producer had just read the names out loud to themselves before hitting "print" on the graphic, they would have caught it. Phonetic pranks only work when they stay on the page.
The Actual Cause of the Asiana 214 Crash
Lost in all the "Sum Ting Wong" noise was the actual tragedy. The NTSB eventually determined that the crash was caused by the flight crew's mismanagement of the plane's descent and an unintended deactivation of automatic airspeed control. It was a complex human-factor error involving cockpit culture and technical misunderstandings of the Boeing 777’s auto-throttle system.
✨ Don't miss: Robert Hanssen: What Most People Get Wrong About the FBI's Most Damaging Spy
It’s a bit tragic that when you Google "Asiana 214," the first thing many people think of isn't the safety recommendations that saved future lives, but a racist prank.
How to Verify Breaking News Today
Don't get fooled. In an age where "Sum Ting Wong" could be generated by an AI bot in seconds, you need a strategy for staying informed without being misled.
- Wait for the second wave. Breaking news is almost always 20% wrong in the first hour. Wait for the correction or the corroboration from multiple independent outlets.
- Look for official statements. Follow the primary source (like the @NTSB_Newsroom) directly on social media rather than relying on a secondary report that might have misinterpreted a phone call.
- Check the "About Us" of the source. If a story is breaking on a site you’ve never heard of, be skeptical. Even established outlets make mistakes, but they usually have a process for corrections.
The Asiana 214 name hoax is a permanent scar on the history of broadcast journalism. It serves as a hilarious, cringeworthy, and deeply sobering reminder that in the race to be first, accuracy is often the first casualty. We see this today with "AI hallucinations" where models invent facts that sound plausible but are totally fake. The pranksters of 2013 used phonetics; the pranksters of 2026 use algorithms.
The defense remains the same: skepticism, diverse perspectives, and a willingness to slow down.
To avoid falling for similar hoaxes or misinformation, your best bet is to cross-reference any "shocking" breaking news with at least three reputable international wires like Reuters, AP, or Agence France-Presse. These organizations have rigorous multi-step verification processes that prevent "intern-level" errors from reaching the public. If a name or a detail sounds like a pun, it almost certainly is.
Always look for the official press release on a ".gov" or ".org" site before sharing "exclusive" details on social media. This simple step keeps you from becoming part of the next viral misinformation cycle.