It finally happened. After months of legal back-and-forth and enough motions to fill a warehouse, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals made it official. They decided that Donald Trump still owes E. Jean Carroll every penny of that massive $83.3 million defamation award.
Honestly, it’s a staggering amount of money. Most people can't even wrap their heads around eighty-three million dollars. But the court was pretty blunt about why they kept it in place. Basically, they looked at how Trump handled himself—both on social media and right there in the courtroom—and decided the jury wasn't crazy for wanting to send a message.
The 70-Page Reality Check
When the appeals court upholds Carroll’s $83 million judgment against Trump, they don't just send a one-sentence email. They released a dense, 70-page opinion. In it, the three-judge panel basically picked apart every single argument Trump's legal team threw at the wall.
Remember the whole "presidential immunity" thing? Trump’s lawyers argued he should be shielded because he made those 2019 comments while he was sitting in the Oval Office. The court didn't buy it. Not even a little bit. They pointed out that he’d already waived that defense by not bringing it up early enough in the case. You can't just keep a legal "get out of jail free" card in your pocket for years and then try to play it when things get expensive.
The judges—Denny Chin, Maria Araújo Kahn, and Sarah A.L. Merriam—were unanimous. That’s a big deal. It wasn't some split decision where one judge felt sorry for him. They all agreed that the trial judge, Lewis Kaplan, did his job right.
✨ Don't miss: Ukraine War Map May 2025: Why the Frontlines Aren't Moving Like You Think
Breaking Down the $83.3 Million
If you're wondering how a defamation case gets into the tens of millions, you have to look at the math. It wasn't just a random number.
- $7.3 million for emotional harm.
- $11 million for a "reputation repair" campaign.
- $65 million in punitive damages.
That last number is the kicker. Punitive damages aren't about what the victim lost; they’re about punishing the person who did it so they don't do it again. The court noted that Trump’s attacks were "prolific" and "reprehensible." They specifically mentioned that Carroll was flooded with death threats and "prolific harassment" because of what he said.
What Most People Get Wrong About This Case
There's a lot of noise online about "double jeopardy" or "suing twice for the same thing." That’s not what happened.
There were actually two separate lawsuits. The first one (Carroll II) was about his 2022 comments and the actual assault in the dressing room. A jury found him liable for sexual abuse and gave her $5 million. This $83.3 million case (Carroll I) was specifically about the things he said in 2019 when she first went public.
🔗 Read more: Percentage of Women That Voted for Trump: What Really Happened
Because the first jury already decided he sexually abused her, the second jury wasn't allowed to argue about whether it happened. They had to take it as a fact. Trump’s team hated this. They felt like they were fighting with one hand tied behind their backs. But the appeals court said that’s just how "collateral estoppel" works. Basically: you don't get a do-over on facts already proven in court.
The "Reprehensibility" Factor
The court used some pretty strong language here. They said the degree of "reprehensibility" in Trump’s conduct was "remarkably high, perhaps unprecedented."
Think about that for a second. In the world of law, "unprecedented" is a heavy word. The judges were looking at the fact that he didn't just deny the claims—he mocked her, called her a "whack job," and said she wasn't his type. And he kept doing it. Even during the trial, he was posting on Truth Social. The court basically said, "Look, if you keep doing the thing you're being sued for while you're in the courtroom, the jury is going to hit you hard."
Why This Still Matters in 2026
We're sitting here in 2026, and this case is still a massive anchor. For Carroll, it’s about more than the money—though I’m sure the $83 million helps. It’s about the legal system finally saying, "We believe you." Her lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, has been pretty vocal about the fact that this ruling proves E. Jean Carroll was telling the truth, and Donald Trump was not.
💡 You might also like: What Category Was Harvey? The Surprising Truth Behind the Number
From a legal standpoint, this sets a scary precedent for anyone who thinks they can use a massive platform to crush a private citizen. The "3.6-to-1" ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages is well within what the Supreme Court usually allows. It makes the judgment very hard to overturn on further appeal.
What Happens Now?
Trump’s team will likely try to take this to the Supreme Court. They've already mentioned it. But here's the thing: the Supreme Court doesn't have to take the case. They get thousands of requests and only pick a handful. Given that the Second Circuit was unanimous and followed established law, the chances of the high court stepping in are... well, slim.
If they decline to hear it, the "stay" on the money will vanish. Trump already had to post a bond for the full amount (plus interest) just to appeal. That money is sitting in a court-controlled account right now.
Next Steps and Insights:
- Follow the Bond: Watch the court filings for the "mandate." Once that's issued, the process for Carroll to actually collect the money starts.
- Monitor the Supreme Court Docket: Keep an eye out for a "petition for writ of certiorari." If the Supreme Court denies it, the legal road ends there.
- Understand "Law of the Case": This ruling reinforces that once a fact is decided in a civil trial, it’s locked in. This is a huge warning for public figures in future defamation suits.
The era of "say whatever you want and tie it up in court forever" might be hitting a very expensive wall. When an appeals court upholds Carroll’s $83 million judgment against Trump, it’s not just a headline; it’s a massive shift in how accountability works for the most powerful people in the world.