Most people think of classic Russian literature as a thousand-page slog through snowstorms and existential dread. But then there’s The Lady with the Dog. It’s short. It’s actually quite readable. And honestly? It’s probably the most accurate depiction of a mid-life crisis and an affair ever written. Anton Chekhov published this story in 1899, yet if you swapped the Yalta seaside for a modern-day resort and replaced the telegrams with DMs, the emotional messiness would be exactly the same.
It’s a story about a guy named Gurov and a woman named Anna Sergeyevna. He’s a serial cheater who thinks women are an "inferior race." She’s trapped in a dull marriage, clutching a white Pomeranian like a shield. They meet. They have an affair. Usually, in 19th-century fiction, this ends with someone jumping under a train or dying of some tragic illness as a moral lesson. Chekhov doesn't do that. He stays in the gray area.
What Actually Happens in The Lady with the Dog?
Dmitri Gurov is bored in Moscow. He's got a wife he doesn't like and three kids he’s largely indifferent toward. When he goes to Yalta for a vacation, he sees a young woman walking on the sea-front with a small dog. That’s the "Lady with the Dog." Her name is Anna.
Gurov is a predator, basically. He lures her in. He thinks this will be just another "short-lived affair" to add to his collection. But something breaks in him. After they sleep together, Anna is devastated. She feels like a "fallen woman." Gurov sits there eating a piece of watermelon while she cries. It’s a brutal, famous detail that shows just how disconnected he is.
But then they go home. Gurov goes back to his snowy Moscow life, expecting to forget her. He doesn’t. He starts seeing her face everywhere. He realizes, for the first time in his life, he’s actually in love. He tracks her down in her own town—a gray, dusty place called S.—and they start a secret life together.
Why the watermelon scene matters
Let's talk about that watermelon. It’s the kind of thing an AI or a bad writer would skip, but it’s why Chekhov is a genius. After their first sexual encounter, Anna is having a moral breakdown. Gurov, meanwhile, is just hungry. He cuts a slice of watermelon and eats it for a long time.
👉 See also: Don’t Forget Me Little Bessie: Why James Lee Burke’s New Novel Still Matters
It’s awkward. It’s uncomfortable. It shows the massive gap between his cynicism and her sincerity. Nabokov famously obsessed over this scene in his lectures. He pointed out that Chekhov uses these tiny, physical details to ground the story in reality rather than melodrama. It’s not a "sweeping romance" at that moment; it’s a guy eating fruit while a woman regrets her life choices.
The Myth of the "Tragic Ending"
We are conditioned by movies to expect a resolution. Either they run away together or they get caught. Chekhov gives us neither. The story ends with them in a hotel room in Moscow, realizing that the most difficult part of their lives is just beginning.
They are stuck. They love each other, but they are both married to other people. There is no easy out. This is what people mean when they talk about "Chekhovian" endings. It’s not about a plot twist. It’s about the realization that life is complicated and rarely offers a clean "The End."
The duality of the secret life
Chekhov writes about how every person has two lives. There’s the public life—the one your boss and your spouse see—and then there’s the secret one. For Gurov, his secret life with Anna is his "real" life. Everything else, his job at the bank and his social standing, feels like a lie.
It’s a proto-existentialist idea. If the most important things happen in secret, what does that say about society? Gurov looks at the people around him and wonders if they all have these hidden, vibrating worlds inside them that nobody else can see.
✨ Don't miss: Donnalou Stevens Older Ladies: Why This Viral Anthem Still Hits Different
Realism vs. Romanticism
In 1899, people were used to stories where "bad" people got punished. If you cheated, you died. Tolstoy did it with Anna Karenina. Flaubert did it with Madame Bovary. But Chekhov refused to judge his characters.
He wasn't saying affairs are great. He was saying affairs are human. He captured the specific kind of loneliness that comes from being with the wrong person. Anna’s husband is a "flunkey" in her eyes—someone she respects but doesn't love. Gurov’s wife is an intellectual who he finds "stiff and pretentious." They aren't villains; they're just mismatched.
The role of the dog
The dog itself—a white Pomeranian—doesn't actually do much. It’s a prop. But it’s a brilliant prop. It makes Anna approachable. It’s a conversation starter. In the beginning, Gurov uses the dog to get to the woman. By the end, the "lady with the dog" is no longer a caricature or a "type" to him. She’s a person. The dog disappears from the narrative as the relationship deepens because Gurov doesn't need the gimmick anymore.
Why You Should Still Care About This Story
If you’ve ever felt like you’re living a life that doesn't belong to you, this story will hit home. It’s about the moment you realize you’ve been "sleepwalking" through your existence.
Critics like Virginia Woolf and Raymond Carver were obsessed with Chekhov for a reason. He pioneered the "slice of life" technique. Before him, stories had to have big, dramatic arcs. After him, a story could just be about two people talking in a room, and it could feel like the most important thing in the world.
🔗 Read more: Donna Summer Endless Summer Greatest Hits: What Most People Get Wrong
Modern interpretations and adaptations
There have been plenty of attempts to put this on screen. The 1960 Soviet film The Lady with the Dog (directed by Iosif Kheifits) is generally considered the gold standard. It captures that specific, hazy Yalta atmosphere. More recently, you can see the DNA of this story in movies like Lost in Translation or Brief Encounter. It’s that same vibe: two people meeting in a "non-place" (a hotel, a resort) and realizing they can’t go back to who they were before.
Actionable Insights for Reading Chekhov
Don’t try to read this like a thriller. You’ll be disappointed. Instead, look for the following things to get the most out of it:
- Watch the weather: Chekhov uses the heat of Yalta and the frost of Moscow to mirror Gurov’s internal state. When he’s in Yalta, he’s "hot" and impulsive. In Moscow, he’s "cold" and cynical—until his feelings for Anna start to thaw him.
- Pay attention to the sounds: The roar of the sea at Oreanda is a huge moment in the story. It represents the indifference of nature to human drama. The sea doesn't care if you're having an affair; it was there before you and will be there after you.
- Notice the repetition: Look at how many times Gurov thinks he’s "done" with women, only to find himself drawn back in. It’s a cycle of self-deception.
- Ignore the "moral": There isn't one. If you're looking for Chekhov to tell you if the affair is right or wrong, you’re reading the wrong author. He’s just showing you the "is-ness" of the situation.
If you want to dive deeper, compare this story to Chekhov’s play The Cherry Orchard. You’ll see the same themes of a fading world and people who are unable to act even when they know they should. The tragedy isn't that things end badly; the tragedy is that things just... continue.
To truly understand the impact of The Lady with the Dog, read it twice. The first time, you’ll follow the plot. The second time, you’ll notice the silence between the lines. That’s where the real story is.
Start by finding a good translation. The ones by Pevear and Volokhonsky are the current favorites for a reason—they keep Chekhov’s sharp, unsentimental edge intact. Avoid older, "Victorian" sounding translations that make the prose feel stuffy. Chekhov was many things, but stuffy wasn't one of them. He was a doctor who saw the world as it was, and he wrote with a scalpel.