You’ve probably seen the poster. A body lies splayed in the blinding white snow of the French Alps, blood blooming like a dark flower around a man’s head. It’s a striking image, but it’s honestly the least interesting thing about Justine Triet’s 2023 masterpiece. When people talk about Anatomy of a Fall, they usually start with the "did she or didn't she" of it all. Did Sandra Voyter push her husband Samuel out of that attic window, or did he jump? Or was it just a freak accident?
But that's not really the point. Not at all.
The film, which took home the Palme d’Or at Cannes and an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay, isn't a whodunnit. It’s a "why-is-marriage-so-hard" it. It is a grueling, 151-minute dissection of a creative partnership that has rotted from the inside out. If you’re looking for a neat resolution with a DNA test or a surprise witness, you’re watching the wrong movie. Triet isn't interested in the physics of the fall. She’s interested in the gravity of the resentment that led up to it.
The Sound of a Falling Marriage
The movie opens with a sonic assault. Sandra, played with a terrifyingly cool intensity by Sandra Hüller, is being interviewed by a grad student. Suddenly, 50 Cent’s "P.I.M.P."—specifically a jaunty, steel-drum instrumental version—starts blasting from the upper floors. It’s loud. It’s aggressive. It’s Samuel, Sandra’s husband, asserting his presence without saying a single word.
He’s working. Or he’s annoyed. Maybe both.
This isn't just a quirky character detail. It’s the first piece of evidence in the trial of their relationship. In Anatomy of a Fall, every mundane domestic habit is weaponized. The film shows us that when a tragedy happens, your entire life becomes "exhibit A." That messy argument you had three months ago? Now it’s a motive. That time you were cold to your spouse in public? Now it’s proof of a sociopathic temperament.
The Burden of Daniel’s Eyes
Then there’s Daniel. Poor Daniel. The couple's eleven-year-old son is visually impaired, a result of a tragic accident years prior that Samuel felt responsible for. This guilt is the engine of the film's conflict. It’s the source of the financial strain, the parental resentment, and the creative jealousy that eventually boils over.
When Daniel finds his father’s body, his world—already narrowed by his limited sight—collapses. The court system then asks this child to do something impossible: decide which parent he believes. Not which one he loves, but which one is a murderer. It’s brutal. The scenes where Daniel is forced to sit in the courtroom and listen to his parents’ most private, ugly moments are harder to watch than the actual death.
✨ Don't miss: Why October London Make Me Wanna Is the Soul Revival We Actually Needed
That Recording: The Argument We Weren't Supposed to Hear
About halfway through the film, the prosecution drops a bombshell. Samuel had been secretly recording their arguments. He was a writer, or at least he wanted to be, and he claimed he was "documenting" life for his book.
Basically, it's a tape of a domestic nuclear meltdown.
We hear Sandra and Samuel screaming. We hear the sound of things breaking. We hear the deep-seated resentment Samuel feels because Sandra is a successful author who "stole" his ideas, while he is stuck homeschooling their son and fixing up a dilapidated chalet in the middle of nowhere.
Sandra’s defense is brilliant and chilling. She tells the court that a recording of an argument is a "map of a relationship," but it’s not the relationship itself. She argues that in a marriage, we sometimes say things we don't mean just to let off steam. We play characters. We vent.
But can you ever really "vent" away the desire to see someone gone?
The Linguistic Trap
One of the cleverest things about Anatomy of a Fall is the language barrier. Sandra is German. Samuel was French. They live in France, but they speak to each other in English—a "neutral ground" that satisfies neither of them.
When Sandra is on trial, she struggles to express the nuances of her emotions in French. She is literally a woman without a language to defend herself. The prosecutor, a man who seems to take personal offense at Sandra’s success and lack of traditional maternal "warmth," uses this to paint her as a cold-blooded ice queen.
🔗 Read more: How to Watch The Wolf and the Lion Without Getting Lost in the Wild
It’s a classic case of how society puts women on trial for their personalities as much as their actions. If Sandra had cried more, if she had been more "broken," would the jury have doubted her less? Probably.
The Forensic Reality vs. The Emotional Truth
Let's talk about the blood splatter.
The defense and the prosecution bring in experts who argue over the trajectory of the fall. One says Samuel was hit with a blunt object (a mallet? a wine bottle?) before he fell. Another says he hit his head on the shed on the way down.
It's a stalemate. The science is inconclusive. This is where the film gets truly uncomfortable because it forces the audience to do exactly what the jury does: make a choice based on vibes.
There is no "smoking gun." There is only a dog named Snoop (the real MVP of the movie, honestly) and a boy who decides to perform a dangerous experiment with aspirin to see if his father was trying to kill himself.
What Actually Happened?
Justine Triet has said in interviews that she knows whether Sandra did it, but she told the cast different things. Sandra Hüller famously asked Triet if her character was guilty so she could play it correctly. Triet’s response? "Just play her like she’s innocent."
That's the genius of the performance. Sandra Voyter is not a "likable" protagonist. She’s prickly, she’s cheated on her husband, she’s unapologetically ambitious. But being a "bad" wife doesn't make you a murderer.
💡 You might also like: Is Lincoln Lawyer Coming Back? Mickey Haller's Next Move Explained
If you look at the evidence for suicide, it's there. Samuel was depressed. He stopped taking his meds. He felt like a failure. But if you look at the evidence for murder, that’s there too. The height of the fall, the timing of the music, the secret recordings.
The film suggests that the "truth" is something we construct because we can't live with the ambiguity.
Actionable Insights for the Perplexed Viewer
If you've finished the film and feel like you're missing a piece of the puzzle, you aren't. You’re just feeling the weight of the film's central thesis: we can never truly know what happens behind closed doors.
To get the most out of a rewatch or a discussion about Anatomy of a Fall, focus on these specific layers:
- Watch the Dog: Snoop isn't just a pet. He’s the bridge between Daniel and his father. The scene with the aspirin is a pivot point for Daniel's testimony. Look closely at how Snoop reacts to Sandra versus Samuel in the flashbacks.
- Listen to the Music: The choice of "P.I.M.P." is intentional. It’s a song about control and gender dynamics, played in a version that feels mocking. It sets the stage for the power struggle that follows.
- Analyze the "Ideas": Samuel accuses Sandra of stealing his book idea. This raises questions about creative ownership. In a marriage of two artists, who owns the "story" of their life?
- The Verdict is Secondary: Don't focus on the "Not Guilty" or "Guilty" label. Focus on the final shot of Sandra at the restaurant. She doesn't look like a woman who has won. She looks like a woman who has been hollowed out.
Anatomy of a Fall leaves us with a haunting realization. Even if you are cleared of a crime, the trial of your life never really ends. You have to go home and live in the house where the fall happened. You have to look your son in the eye and hope he doesn't see a monster.
You have to live with the version of the truth you decided to believe.
Next Steps for Deep Context:
- Research the "Steel Drum" Soundtrack: Look into the specific instrumental cover by Bacao rhythm & Steel Band to understand the tonal irony Triet was aiming for.
- Examine French Courtroom Procedure: Unlike the US or UK, the French "juge d'instruction" and the aggressive role of the prosecutor (Avocat Général) change how truth is negotiated in film.
- Read the Script's Origin: Explore how Triet and her partner Arthur Harari co-wrote the script during the COVID-19 lockdowns, which influenced the themes of domestic claustrophobia.