Amazon tried to build a social network. Honestly, most people didn't even notice. It was called Amazon Spark, and it lived inside the main shopping app, tucked away like a digital experiment that nobody asked for but everyone sort of expected eventually. Launched in 2017, Spark was Jeff Bezos’s play for the Instagram crowd. It was a feed. It had photos. You could tap a little "smile" icon instead of a "like." Most importantly, you could buy every single thing you saw in those photos with a single click.
It failed.
By mid-2019, the plug was pulled. But the story of the social network Amazon Prime users actually had—and then lost—is a fascinating look at why "shoppable content" is way harder to get right than it looks on paper.
👉 See also: How Many Blimps Are There in the World? The Truth About These Rare Giants
Why Amazon Spark Was Born
The idea made sense in a boardroom. People were already looking at beautiful living rooms on Pinterest and fashion influencers on Instagram. Then, they’d leave those apps, open Amazon, and search for what they saw. Amazon wanted to cut out the middleman. They wanted you to discover the "need" and fulfill the "want" in the exact same place.
Spark was exclusive. You had to be an Amazon Prime member to post or comment. Non-Prime members could look, but they couldn't participate. This created a weird, gated community where the only common thread was that everyone paid a yearly subscription fee for shipping.
It wasn't a place for friends. It was a place for stuff.
When you first opened it, you picked a few interests—think "Home Decor," "Tech," or "Fitness." Then, the algorithm fed you a stream of high-quality images. It looked exactly like Instagram, but with a cynical twist: every post was a literal storefront. If a blogger posted a photo of their morning coffee, there were shopping tags for the mug, the pour-over dripper, the table, and probably the rug too.
The Identity Crisis of a Shopping Feed
Social networks usually work because they satisfy a human need for connection or entertainment. Spark satisfied a need for consumption. That’s a fundamentally different vibe.
Think about your favorite social apps. You go there to see what your cousin is up to or to watch a guy build a primitive hut in the woods. On Amazon Spark, the "content" was the product. This meant the feed felt like a never-ending catalog. Even though Amazon recruited "Enthusiasts" and influencers to seed the platform with pretty pictures, the authenticity was zero. Everyone knew why they were there.
The engagement felt forced.
People didn't stay. Average session times were abysmal compared to the hours people spent scrolling TikTok or Facebook. You can only look at shoppable blenders for so long before your brain shuts off. Also, the UI was clunky. Navigating to Spark required digging through the "Programs and Features" menu in the Amazon app. It was a chore. If you have to work that hard to find a social network, it’s not really a social network; it’s a hidden feature.
What Actually Happened to the Social Features?
When Spark died in 2019, it didn't just vanish into thin air. Amazon doesn't usually delete code; they recycle it. The "Social Network Amazon Prime" concept evolved into something called Amazon Live and the Amazon Influencer Program.
From Spark to Live
Amazon Live is basically QVC for the internet. It’s a live-streaming platform where hosts demo products in real-time. It’s much more successful than Spark ever was because it leans into the "performance" of shopping. There's a chat box. There's a ticking clock. It feels like an event rather than a static feed of ads.
The Feed Lives On (Sorta)
If you open your Amazon app today, you’ll probably see "Inspire." This is the newest iteration of the social experiment. It’s a vertical video feed—very TikTok-esque—designed to keep you scrolling through short clips of people unboxing gadgets or trying on clothes. It’s the ghost of Spark, just reimagined for a world that prefers video over photos.
Why Prime Members Didn't Care
It’s hard to build a community around a credit card. Prime is a utility. We love it because the packages arrive fast and "The Boys" is a great show. We don't love it because we want to "hang out" with other Prime members.
The social network Amazon Prime tried to foster lacked the "social" part of the equation.
- No personal connection: You weren't following friends; you were following "interests."
- The "Buying" mindset: When people are in a social mood, they want to be distracted. When they are in a shopping mood, they want to find the item and get out. Mixing them creates friction.
- Privacy concerns: Amazon already knows what we buy. Do we really want to post a public feed of our curated shopping lists for them to track even further? The answer for most was a resounding no.
Real-World Lessons from the Spark Era
Social commerce is the "Holy Grail" for tech giants. Meta has tried it. Google has tried it. ByteDance (TikTok) is currently the only one arguably winning with TikTok Shop, but even that is controversial and cluttered.
Amazon’s failure with Spark teaches us that "Discovery" can’t be faked. It has to feel organic. If every post is an ad, it’s not a social network—it’s a digital circular.
The experts at Forrester and Gartner have pointed out for years that Amazon’s biggest hurdle isn't tech; it’s culture. Amazon is built on efficiency. Social media is built on wasting time beautifully. Those two things are diametrically opposed.
How to Actually Use Amazon’s Modern "Social" Features
If you’re looking for the remnants of that social experience today, don't look for a standalone app. Amazon has integrated these "social" discovery tools into the main interface to help you find better products without the fake "community" feel.
- Check out Amazon Inspire: Look for the lightbulb icon at the bottom of your app. This is the spiritual successor to Spark. It’s great for seeing how a piece of furniture actually looks in a real house or how a jacket fits a real person.
- Follow your favorite reviewers: You can actually "Follow" specific Amazon Customers whose reviews you find helpful. When they post a new review, it might show up in your personalized recommendations. It’s social-lite.
- Use the "Interesting Finds" section: Amazon frequently tests curated, Pinterest-style grids under the "Explore" or "Interesting Finds" headers. These are essentially Spark feeds without the social pressure.
- Join Amazon-focused groups elsewhere: If you actually want to talk about Prime deals or find "hidden gems," the best social networks aren't on Amazon. They are on Reddit (r/amazonprime or r/amazondeals) or specialized Facebook groups.
Amazon Spark was a bold, expensive mistake. It proved that even a company with 200 million Prime members can't force people to be "social" where they go to buy toilet paper. The social network Amazon Prime once hosted is gone, but the data it provided has shaped how we shop today. Now, instead of a dedicated social tab, the "social" elements are baked into every video, every customer photo, and every livestreamed demo.
Actionable Insight: Stop looking for a dedicated Amazon social network. Instead, use the Amazon Inspire feed specifically for visual verification of products before you buy. It’s the most "human" part of the platform, even if the "social" dream is officially dead.