Money does weird things to people. It’s a cliché, sure, but when you look at the all the money in the world movie, you realize it’s actually a terrifying understatement. Ridley Scott’s 2017 thriller isn’t just a movie about a kidnapping; it’s a cold, hard look at a man who had more money than anyone in history and still couldn’t bring himself to pay for his grandson’s life.
Honestly, the drama on screen is almost eclipsed by the chaos that happened after the cameras stopped rolling. You’ve probably heard bits and pieces—the last-minute recasting, the massive pay gap scandal, the rush to beat a deadline. It was a mess. But a fascinating one.
The Brutal True Story Behind the Screen
The movie is based on the 1973 kidnapping of John Paul Getty III. At the time, his grandfather, J. Paul Getty, was the richest man in the world. When the kidnappers demanded $17 million, the elder Getty didn’t just say no. He gave a press conference explaining why he was saying no.
"I have 14 other grandchildren," he basically told the world. "If I pay one penny now, then I'll have 14 kidnapped grandchildren."
It sounds logical in a cold, business-like way, but for the boy’s mother, Gail Harris, it was a nightmare. She was played by Michelle Williams in the film, and she captured that "steely desperation" perfectly. Gail had no money of her own because she’d refused alimony during her divorce just to keep custody of her kids. So, she was stuck between a ruthless Italian gang and a father-in-law who valued his art collection more than his flesh and blood.
🔗 Read more: Blink-182 Mark Hoppus: What Most People Get Wrong About His 2026 Comeback
Things got dark. The kidnappers eventually cut off the teenager's ear and mailed it to a newspaper in Rome. Only then did the old man relent, but even then, he treated it like a tax write-off. He only paid $2.2 million because that was the maximum amount his accountants said was tax-deductible. The rest? He lent it to his son at 4% interest.
The Kevin Spacey Erasure
If you watched the all the money in the world movie, you saw Christopher Plummer playing the billionaire patriarch. He was incredible—even snagged an Oscar nomination for it. But here’s the kicker: he wasn’t even in the original version of the movie.
The film was finished. Done. Locked. Kevin Spacey had played J. Paul Getty, wearing pounds of prosthetic makeup to look older. Then, just weeks before the premiere, the sexual misconduct allegations against Spacey broke.
Ridley Scott didn’t blink.
💡 You might also like: Why Grand Funk’s Bad Time is Secretly the Best Pop Song of the 1970s
He decided to erase Spacey from the movie and reshoot every single one of his scenes with Plummer. Most directors would have pushed the release date back six months. Scott did it in nine days and still hit the original December release date. It’s unheard of. They spent $10 million just on those reshoots, which is a huge chunk of the original $40 million budget.
Why the Recast Actually Improved the Movie
A lot of critics think the movie actually got better because of the swap. Spacey was playing a "character" under a mask of latex. Plummer, who was 88 at the time, brought a natural, "lion-in-winter" authority to the role. He didn't need makeup to look like a man who had seen everything and cared about nothing.
That Infamous Pay Gap Scandal
While the movie was winning praise for its technical hurdles, a different kind of storm was brewing. It turned out that Mark Wahlberg—who played the security advisor Fletcher Chace—negotiated a $1.5 million payout for those nine days of reshoots.
Michelle Williams? She got an $80 per diem. Totaling less than $1,000.
📖 Related: Why La Mera Mera Radio is Actually Dominating Local Airwaves Right Now
The internet went nuclear. Both actors were represented by the same agency, WME, yet the disparity was staggering. Williams had even said she’d do the reshoots for free because she believed in the project and wanted to save the film from the Spacey controversy.
Wahlberg eventually ended up donating that $1.5 million to the Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund in Williams' name. It was a PR save, but it highlighted a massive issue in how Hollywood handles contracts.
Cinematic Style vs. Reality
Ridley Scott is a master of "mood." In this film, everything is washed in grey and blue. It feels expensive but cold. He uses the setting—Getty’s massive estate, Sutton Place—to show how wealth creates a prison.
The movie does take some liberties. In the film, the climax is a high-stakes chase through an Italian village. In real life, the release was a bit more bureaucratic and less "action movie," but that’s Hollywood for you. You need a finale.
Key Details the Movie Nailed:
- The Payphone: Getty really did have a payphone installed for guests at his mansion because he didn't want to pay for their long-distance calls.
- The Ear: The scene where they cut off Paul's ear is notoriously hard to watch. It reflects the real-life brutality the boy faced during those five months in a cave.
- The Art: Getty was obsessed with objects. He famously said, "A person who doesn't have a hobby has nothing." His hobby just happened to be buying up the world's history while his family crumbled.
Why You Should Still Watch It
Despite the baggage, the all the money in the world movie stands up as a top-tier thriller. It’s a rare bird—a big-budget adult drama that doesn't rely on explosions or superheroes. It relies on the tension of a mother trying to outmaneuver the most powerful man on earth.
If you’re interested in the "Great Man" theory of history, or just want to see a masterclass in acting from Michelle Williams and Christopher Plummer, it’s a must-watch. It's currently available on most streaming platforms for rent or purchase.
Actionable Insights for Viewers
- Watch for the Seams: See if you can spot the digital "tucking" in the reshot scenes. Scott had to digitally insert Plummer into some shots where other actors weren't available to return. It’s surprisingly seamless.
- Compare with "Trust": If you find this story fascinating, check out the FX series Trust. It covers the same kidnapping but takes a much more surreal, stylized approach over ten episodes.
- Read the Source: The movie is based on John Pearson’s book Painfully Rich. It goes much deeper into the "Getty Curse" and the tragic later life of John Paul Getty III, who never really recovered from the trauma.
- Follow the Money: Look into the J. Paul Getty Museum in Los Angeles. The movie explains the origins of that massive endowment—a trust designed to avoid taxes that eventually became one of the world's wealthiest art institutions.