Tim Burton’s 2010 reimagining of Underland didn’t just change the scenery; it fundamentally shifted how we look at alice in wonderland the movie characters. People walked into theaters expecting a sugary Disney remake. What they got was a gothic, war-torn landscape populated by trauma-informed versions of Lewis Carroll’s icons. It’s been over fifteen years since that billion-dollar hit landed, yet the way Mia Wasikowska and Johnny Depp portrayed these roles continues to spark debates among literary purists and film buffs alike.
Underland is messy. Honestly, the characters are messier. When you look back at the 2010 film, you aren't just seeing a girl in a blue dress; you’re seeing a young woman grappling with the grief of losing her father and the stifling expectations of Victorian society. It's heavy stuff for a "kids' movie."
Alice Kingsleigh and the Subversion of the Heroine
Alice isn't a child in this version. She's nineteen. Mia Wasikowska played her with this sort of detached, dreamy stoicism that some critics found boring, but if you look closer, it’s actually a very specific choice. She’s a girl who thinks she’s dreaming because the real world—the world of corsets and arranged marriages—is too stifling to be real.
The movie hinges on the concept of "Muchness." The Absolem (the Blue Caterpillar) tells her she’s lost it. It’s a weirdly profound way to describe depression or the loss of self. Most people forget that Alice’s journey in the movie is basically a psychological reclamation project. She isn't just fighting a Jabberwocky; she’s fighting her own hesitation. By the time she puts on that silver armor, she isn't the passive observer from the 1951 animated version. She’s a warrior. That’s a massive departure from Carroll’s original text, where Alice is mostly just a confused kid trying to navigate nonsensical bureaucracy.
Tarrant Hightopp: Why Johnny Depp’s Mad Hatter Was So Divisive
Let’s talk about the Hatter. Johnny Depp’s Tarrant Hightopp is arguably the most famous of all alice in wonderland the movie characters, but he’s also the most controversial. Burton and Depp decided to give him a tragic backstory involving the destruction of his clan by the Jabberwocky.
Suddenly, the "madness" isn't just whimsical. It’s PTSD.
When the Hatter shifts his accent to a deep, Scottish brogue, it represents his anger and his past. It’s a jarring choice. Some fans loved the depth; others felt it robbed the character of his pure, nonsensical essence. Carroll’s Hatter was mad because he was a hatter—mercury poisoning was the real-world subtext—but Burton’s Hatter is mad because he’s heartbroken.
🔗 Read more: Why the Slow Horses Book Series is the Best Thing to Happen to Spy Fiction
The relationship between Alice and the Hatter in the 2010 film is also... complicated. There’s an undercurrent of intense emotional intimacy that borders on a romance, which definitely weirded out some people who grew up with the book. But in the context of the movie’s themes of found family, it kind of works. The Hatter is the only person who recognizes Alice’s "Muchness" before she even sees it in herself.
Iracebeth and Mirana: A Tale of Two Sisters
The Red Queen and the White Queen are the movie’s most fascinating case study in sibling rivalry. Helena Bonham Carter’s Iracebeth (the Red Queen) is a masterpiece of camp and insecurity. Her head is literally too big for her body, but her ego is even bigger.
But here’s the thing: she’s actually more "human" than the White Queen.
Iracebeth is fueled by a desire to be loved. She’s a tyrant, sure, but she’s a tyrant because she was the unloved child. On the flip side, Anne Hathaway’s Mirana (the White Queen) is deeply unsettling. Hathaway played her with this floaty, ethereal grace, but there’s a darkness there. She won't kill anything herself because she "vowed not to harm any living thing," so she gets Alice to do her dirty work for her.
- Iracebeth: Brutally honest about her villainy.
- Mirana: Covers her manipulative nature with white lipstick and hand-waving.
It’s a classic Burton trope. The "ugly" character is vulnerable, and the "beautiful" character is slightly plastic and eerie. If you rewatch the movie today, you might find yourself actually feeling sorry for the Red Queen when she's betrayed by the Knave of Hearts (Stayne). Speaking of Stayne, Crispin Glover brought a genuinely creepy, sycophantic energy to that role that rarely gets enough credit.
The Creatures of Underland
The CGI characters are where the movie’s budget really went to work. The Cheshire Cat, voiced by the legendary Stephen Fry, is probably the most faithful translation from page to screen. He’s cynical, he’s detached, and he has that signature evaporate-at-will ability. Unlike the Hatter, Chessur doesn’t really have a "side." He’s a survivor.
Then you have the March Hare. He’s constantly throwing things. Cups, saucers, whatever is in reach. It’s a small detail, but it captures the frantic, chaotic energy of the tea party perfectly.
The Jabberwocky, voiced by Christopher Lee, turned a nonsensical poem into a literal dragon of doom. It was a bold move to make the poem’s monster the "final boss" of the film. It turned a whimsical story into a high-fantasy epic, which was a very mid-2000s trend (think Lord of the Rings influence).
Why the Character Designs Sparked a Trend
You can’t talk about these characters without mentioning Colleen Atwood’s costume design. She won an Oscar for it, and for good reason. The clothes tell the story. Alice’s dress literally shrinks and grows with her. The Red Queen’s dress is covered in hearts, but they look like stiff, uncomfortable cages.
This visual language influenced a whole decade of "dark fairy tale" movies. From Maleficent to Snow White and the Huntsman, the DNA of Burton’s Alice characters is everywhere. They proved that you could take a classic children's story and make it visually "edgy" enough for adults while still selling a ton of toys.
The Legacy of the 2010 Cast
When people search for alice in wonderland the movie characters, they are often looking for the 2010 versions because those are the most visually distinct. They aren't just archetypes; they are people (or creatures) with scars.
The movie’s success led to a sequel, Alice Through the Looking Glass, which leaned even harder into the backstories of the Hatter and the Queens. While it didn't hit as hard at the box office, it solidified the idea that these characters have lives outside of Alice’s arrival. They aren't just waiting for her to show up; they are living through a civil war.
That’s a big deal. It changed the "Alice" mythos from a dream sequence to a real, tangible place. Whether you like that change or not, it’s hard to deny that Burton’s cast left an indelible mark on pop culture.
Actionable Steps for Alice Fans
If you’re looking to dive deeper into the world of these characters, don’t just stop at the 2010 film. The evolution of these figures is wild.
- Read the Original: Go back to Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. You'll see just how much Burton changed. The original characters are much colder and more logical-nonsensical.
- Compare the 1951 Version: Watch the Disney animated classic. The character designs there are the "blueprints" that Burton was trying to subvert.
- Look at the Concept Art: Search for the character sketches by Michael Kutsche. Seeing how the Red Queen evolved from a drawing to Helena Bonham Carter is a masterclass in film design.
- Explore the "American McGee's Alice" Lore: If you like the darker take on the characters, check out the lore from this video game series. It predates the Burton movie and goes even further into the "Alice is traumatized" angle.
The enduring appeal of alice in wonderland the movie characters lies in their flexibility. They can be silly, they can be scary, and they can be deeply human. In 2010, they were all three at once. That’s probably why we’re still talking about them today. Underland isn't a place you visit once; it's a place that stays with you, mostly because of the strange people who live there.