Alex Murdaugh is still wearing a tan jumpsuit. Honestly, if you expected him to be out by now, you haven't been following the absolute mess that is the South Carolina legal system. As of early 2026, the man who once ran the Lowcountry like a personal fiefdom is sitting in a maximum-security cell. He's not in the general population. Because of his high profile—and the fact that he was once a powerful prosecutor—he’s tucked away in a statewide protective custody unit.
The fall was fast. It was brutal. It was also, according to a lot of people in Hampton County, a long time coming.
But "where he is" physically is only half the story. The real drama is what's happening in the courts right now. While you’ve been living your life, Murdaugh’s lawyers have been busy trying to tear his conviction apart. They aren't just filing paperwork; they are throwing everything at the wall to see if a single brick of that life sentence cracks.
Alex Murdaugh Now: The 2026 Appeal That Could Change Everything
Mark your calendar for February 11, 2026. That is the day the South Carolina Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments for Murdaugh’s murder conviction. This isn't just a routine check-in. It is basically his last stand.
His legal team, led by the ever-vocal Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin, is "cautiously optimistic." They have to be. That's their job. But they actually have some ammo this time. They aren't just arguing that he didn't do it—though they still say that—they are arguing the trial itself was a circus.
The biggest bone of contention? Becky Hill.
If you followed the "Trial of the Century" back in 2023, you remember the Clerk of Court. She was the one who seemed to be everywhere. Well, since then, things have gone south for her. She actually pleaded guilty to felony charges including perjury and obstruction of justice. She was accused of using her office to promote her own book about the case and, more importantly, of whispering things to the jury.
✨ Don't miss: Franklin D Roosevelt Civil Rights Record: Why It Is Way More Complicated Than You Think
Murdaugh’s team says she told jurors not to be "fooled" by him. They claim she told them to watch his body language on the stand.
The state says it didn't matter. They argue the evidence was so overwhelming that a few comments from a "publicity-seeking clerk" wouldn't have changed the verdict. But the Supreme Court has to decide a very specific question: Does the law require Murdaugh to prove the comments actually changed a juror's mind, or just that they could have? It’s a technicality that could literally open the prison doors for a retrial.
The Financial "Trial Within a Trial"
There’s another reason the 2026 appeal is so spicy. The defense is arguing that Judge Clifton Newman messed up by letting the jury hear about all of Murdaugh's financial crimes during the murder trial.
If you remember, the prosecution's theory was that Alex killed Maggie and Paul to create a "distraction." They said he was about to be exposed for stealing millions from his law firm and clients, and he needed a tragedy to buy time.
The defense calls this "storytelling masquerading as motive." They argue it turned the murder trial into a trial about his character as a thief. Basically, they're saying the jury didn't convict a murderer; they convicted a guy they already knew was a liar and a crook.
Life Behind Bars: What Murdaugh’s Daily Existence Looks Like
When he isn't meeting with lawyers, Alex Murdaugh is just another number in the South Carolina Department of Corrections. He’s 57 now. The red hair is thinner. The commanding presence he had in the courtroom has been replaced by the "shuffling" walk of a man in shackles.
🔗 Read more: 39 Carl St and Kevin Lau: What Actually Happened at the Cole Valley Property
He's currently serving:
- Two consecutive life sentences for the murders of Maggie and Paul.
- 40 years in federal prison for financial crimes (this runs concurrently).
- 27 years in state prison for a separate set of financial crimes.
Even if by some miracle his murder conviction is overturned in 2026, he isn't going home. He’d be 76 before he’s even eligible for release on the financial stuff. The state made sure of that. It’s what prosecutors call "insurance on top of insurance."
Reports from inside suggest he spends a lot of time on his "prison job" and working on his own legal petitions. He's reportedly still in touch with his surviving son, Buster, though the relationship remains a subject of intense public speculation. Buster has publicly stated he doesn't believe the trial was fair, but he's kept his distance from the day-to-day legal fray.
The Lingering Shadows: Stephen Smith and Gloria Satterfield
You can't talk about Alex Murdaugh now without talking about the cases that refuse to stay buried. The investigation into the 2015 death of Stephen Smith is still technically active. SLED (South Carolina Law Enforcement Division) ruled it a murder back in 2023, but no one has been charged as of January 2026.
Then there’s the housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. Alex admitted to stealing the $4.3 million insurance settlement meant for her sons. He’s paying for that with his current sentences, but the "Murdaugh Murders" saga opened a Pandora’s box of cold cases that the Lowcountry is still trying to process.
Why This Still Matters Two Years Later
A lot of people are tired of hearing about the Murdaughs. I get it. It was everywhere. But the reason it's still a top-tier news story in 2026 is that it exposes the "good ol' boy" system in a way we've never seen before.
💡 You might also like: Effingham County Jail Bookings 72 Hours: What Really Happened
It wasn't just about one man. It was about a family that controlled the police, the courts, and the banks for three generations. When that kind of power collapses, the shockwaves take years to settle.
The 2026 Supreme Court hearing is about more than Alex Murdaugh's freedom. It’s a test of whether the system can actually hold one of its own accountable without breaking the rules of the law itself. If the court finds that the clerk's misconduct was enough to taint the trial, it doesn't mean Alex is innocent. It just means the state didn't do its job right the first time.
Actionable Insights for Following the 2026 Appeal
If you're tracking this case, don't just look for "guilty" or "not guilty." The nuance is in the appellate rulings.
- Watch the February 11 Hearing: The oral arguments will likely be livestreamed. Pay attention to the justices' questions about "prejudice." If they seem fixated on whether Becky Hill’s comments were "objectively" influential, that's a huge sign for the defense.
- The "Motive" Ruling: If the court decides the financial evidence was handled incorrectly, it sets a massive precedent for how South Carolina prosecutors can use a defendant’s past bad acts in future trials.
- Check the Federal Status: Even if the state murder conviction is vacated, Murdaugh is still a federal prisoner. He wouldn't be walking out of a jail cell; he’d be transferred to a federal facility to start that 40-year clock.
The Murdaugh story isn't over. It’s just moved from the swampy woods of Moselle to the sterile, marbled halls of the Supreme Court in Columbia. We’ll know by mid-2026 if the saga gets a second season in a courtroom or if the book finally closes on Alex Murdaugh for good.
Stay informed by checking the South Carolina Judicial Branch website for the formal opinion, which usually drops a few months after oral arguments. If the justices take a long time to rule, it usually means there’s a serious internal debate about whether to grant that retrial.
---