You've probably looked at a map of the United States and noticed something pretty striking. Alaska is huge. It's actually massive, dwarf-ing Texas and making California look like a little cousin. But when the presidential election rolls around every four years, that giant landmass translates into a surprisingly small number of votes.
So, how many electors does Alaska have exactly?
The short answer: Three.
Since it joined the Union in 1959, Alaska has consistently held three electoral votes. It doesn't matter that the state covers over 663,000 square miles or that it’s the king of the North. In the eyes of the Electoral College, population is the name of the game, and Alaska’s population just hasn’t hit the threshold to climb higher than that baseline minimum.
The Simple Math Behind the Magic Number
Honestly, the way we get to three is basically a constitutional formula that hasn't changed since the 1780s. Every state is guaranteed at least one seat in the House of Representatives. Then, you add the two Senators that every state gets regardless of size.
💡 You might also like: How Much Did the Military Parade Cost: What Most People Get Wrong
$1 \text{ (Representative)} + 2 \text{ (Senators)} = 3 \text{ Electoral Votes}$
It’s the floor. You can't go lower. Currently, Alaska shares this "Three Vote Club" with states like Wyoming, Vermont, Delaware, North Dakota, and South Dakota, plus the District of Columbia.
Even though the 2020 Census saw some shifts in power across the lower 48—Texas gained two seats, while New York and California actually lost one—Alaska stayed rock steady. The data confirmed what most Alaskans already knew: while the population is growing in some spots like the Mat-Su Valley, it’s not growing fast enough compared to the rest of the country to trigger a second House seat.
Why doesn't the land size matter?
It feels kinda unfair, right? If you’re a rancher in the Interior or a fisherman in Sitka, your "district" is basically the entire state. But the U.S. Constitution (specifically Article II, Section 1) bases the number of electors strictly on Congressional representation.
If we allocated electors by land area, Alaska would be a powerhouse. But because it’s based on people, Alaska remains a "small" state in the political arena.
How Alaska Picks the People Who Actually Vote
When you go to the polls, you aren't technically voting for the President directly. You’re voting for a slate of electors. In Alaska, these are three real people—party loyalists, activists, or community leaders—who have pledged to vote for their party’s candidate.
For example, in the 2024 election, the three Republican electors were Eileen Becker, Ron Johnson, and Rick Whitbeck. Because Donald Trump won the popular vote in the state, these three were the ones who officially traveled to Juneau (or met virtually/in person as required) to cast those three ballots.
Alaska is a winner-take-all state. If a candidate wins by one vote or 100,000 votes, they take all three electors. This is different from Maine or Nebraska, where they split their votes.
The Ranked Choice Voting Twist
Now, here is where it gets interesting. Alaska changed the game recently by adopting Ranked Choice Voting (RCV). While the number of electors didn't change, the way they are determined did.
✨ Don't miss: Bernie Sanders: Why Democrats Must Fight the GOP Redistricting Push Now
In a standard election, if a third-party candidate pulls 10%, they might act as a "spoiler." Under Alaska's new system, if no one gets 50% in the first round, the lowest-ranking candidates are eliminated and their votes are redistributed based on the voters' second choices.
This means the three electors who eventually represent Alaska are guaranteed to be backed by a majority of the voters who participated in the ranking process. It’s a layer of nuance that most other "three-vote" states don't have.
Does Alaska's Three Votes Even Matter?
Critics often say that three votes is a drop in the bucket. When you need 270 to win, why care about three?
But history tells a different story. In a razor-thin election, every single elector is a potential tie-breaker. Think about the 2000 election between Bush and Gore. It came down to a few hundred votes in Florida. If a couple of small states had swung differently, those three votes from the Last Frontier would have been the difference between the White House and a concession speech.
Furthermore, Alaska has a unique political streak. While it’s been reliably Republican since 1964 (the only time it went Blue was for Lyndon B. Johnson), the state has a massive "non-partisan" and "undeclared" voting bloc.
More than half of Alaska’s voters don’t belong to a major party. This makes the state more "purple" or "independent" than the national map usually suggests.
✨ Don't miss: Tom Bird and Lorna Anderson: What Really Happened in the Murder Ordained Case
Real-World Impact of the 2020 Census
The Census Bureau is the ultimate arbiter of these numbers. Every ten years, they count everyone. After the 2020 count, the total of 538 electoral votes was redistributed.
- California: 54 votes (Lost 1)
- Texas: 40 votes (Gained 2)
- Alaska: 3 votes (No change)
The next time this could possibly change is after the 2030 Census. For Alaska to gain an elector, it would need to reach a population level that warrants a second House seat. Given current trends, Alaska will likely remain at three for the foreseeable future.
What You Should Do Next
Understanding how many electors Alaska has is just the start of being an informed voter in the North. If you want to make sure your voice is heard within this system, here are the direct steps you can take:
- Check your registration: If you’ve moved between Anchorage, Fairbanks, or a remote village, your polling place has changed. Use the Alaska Division of Elections "myvoterportal" to verify your status.
- Study the RCV system: Since Alaska uses Ranked Choice, don't just look at the top two candidates. Look at the third and fourth options. Your second-place vote can actually decide who those three electors eventually are.
- Watch the 2030 Census: It seems far away, but participation in the census is the only way Alaska will ever move from three electors to four. Every person not counted is a missed opportunity for more federal representation.
Alaska’s three votes might seem small, but in the complex machinery of American democracy, they are a vital piece of the puzzle.