You’ve probably seen the clip or read the headline at some point over the last decade. Alan Simpson, the lanky, fast-talking former Senator from Wyoming, leaning into a microphone or pecking away at an email, letting loose on the American public. He didn’t just call out budget math. He went for the jugular. He called the baby boomers—and specifically those fiercely defending Social Security—the greediest generation.
It was a moment that basically set the internet on fire before "going viral" was even a polished science. But here’s the thing: most people remember the insult, but they’ve forgotten the actual war that was happening in Washington when he said it.
Alan Simpson wasn’t just some retired guy shouting at clouds. He was the co-chair of President Obama’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform in 2010. Alongside Erskine Bowles, he was tasked with a job nobody wanted: fixing the United States’ multi-trillion-dollar debt. And in Simpson's world, you couldn’t talk about debt without talking about the "milk cow with 310 million tits." Yes, he actually said that.
The Email That Started It All
The phrase "greediest generation" didn't just pop out of thin air during a press conference. It was born in a blistering email exchange with Ashley Carson, the executive director of the Older Women’s League (OWL). Carson had written a blog post criticizing Simpson’s approach to Social Security reform.
Simpson, never one to use a filter when a sledgehammer was available, hit back. He told her she was "stuck in the past" and that the current system was unsustainable. He argued that the generation currently drawing benefits was essentially "milking" the system at the expense of their grandchildren.
"We've reached a point now where it's like a milk cow with 310 million tits!"
That specific line, combined with his characterization of seniors as the alan simpson greediest generation, triggered an immediate call for his resignation. Groups like Social Security Works and the AARP went into full battle mode. They saw him as a man who viewed a earned benefit—something people paid into for 40 years—as a form of welfare or "greed."
Why Alan Simpson Was So Angry
To understand the man, you have to understand his obsession with the "moment of truth." That was the name of the final report his commission released. Simpson saw a demographic tidal wave coming. He looked at the math and saw a future where there wouldn't be enough workers to support the retirees.
He wasn't wrong about the math, but he was arguably "reckless" with the sociology.
In Simpson's view, the Boomers had enjoyed a booming post-war economy, rising home values, and were now demanding that the younger, struggling generations (Gen X and Millennials) pay higher taxes to keep Social Security checks exactly as they were. To him, that was the height of selfishness. He often pointed out that when Social Security started, the retirement age was 65 and life expectancy was much lower. People weren't supposed to collect checks for 30 years.
👉 See also: Birmingham Weather Tomorrow: Why Saturday’s Forecast is Kinda Deceiving
But he missed the human element. Honestly, when you tell a 70-year-old widow who survives on $1,200 a month that she's part of the "greediest generation," you aren't going to win a policy debate. You're going to start a riot.
The Fallout: Patty Myers and the Voice of the People
If Simpson was the villain of this story for many, Patty Myers became the hero. She was a retired schoolteacher from Montana who wrote a response that basically broke the early 2010s internet.
She didn't use "polite" political language. She called him a "lunk-headed leech" and reminded him that she had been paying into the system since she was 15 years old. Her point was simple: it isn't "greed" to expect the money you were promised after you were forced to pay into a system for half a century.
This clash highlighted the massive gap in how we talk about "entitlements."
- The Simpson View: Social Security is a fiscal line item that must be balanced like a checkbook.
- The Public View: Social Security is a sacred contract. You pay, you play, you collect.
Is the "Greediest Generation" Label Fair?
It’s complicated. If you look at the wealth gap today, the "greediest generation" argument has found new life among younger activists. They point to the fact that the older generation holds the vast majority of the country's wealth while younger people struggle with student debt and a housing crisis.
However, calling an entire generation "greedy" ignores the millions of seniors living in poverty.
Simpson’s commission—the "Simpson-Bowles" plan—proposed several things that are still discussed in 2026:
📖 Related: The Sioux City Airline Crash: How Flight 232 Changed Aviation Forever
- Raising the retirement age: Pushing it to 68 or 69.
- Chained CPI: A different way of calculating inflation that would result in smaller cost-of-living adjustments.
- Means testing: Reducing benefits for the wealthy.
The plan failed to get the 14 votes needed to trigger an automatic vote in Congress. It died on the vine, but the ghost of Alan Simpson’s rhetoric still haunts every single budget debate we have today.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Quote
People think Simpson hated old people. He didn't. He was one. He was 79 when he made those comments.
His frustration was actually directed at the lobbying groups. He felt that organizations like the AARP were "terrorizing" politicians into avoiding any meaningful reform. He thought they were protecting the present at the expense of the future. Whether he was right or wrong, his delivery ensured that the conversation stayed focused on his insults rather than his spreadsheets.
Actionable Insights: What This Means for You
The controversy surrounding Alan Simpson and the "greediest generation" isn't just a history lesson. It's a roadmap for what's coming next as Social Security nears its projected "insolvency" date in the mid-2030s.
- Don't rely solely on the "Sacred Contract": Regardless of who is "greedy," the trust funds are depleting. If you are under 50, you need to be diversifying your retirement outside of government promises.
- Understand "Chained CPI": This term will come back. It sounds boring, but it's a stealth cut to benefits over time. Keep an eye on it in future legislation.
- Look at the "Means Testing" Debate: There is a growing movement to stop giving Social Security checks to millionaires. This is one of the few Simpson-era ideas that actually has bipartisan interest today.
- Vote on Policy, Not Soundbites: Simpson's "milk cow" comment was offensive, but the report he co-authored was one of the most detailed looks at the U.S. debt ever produced. It’s worth reading the actual proposals rather than just the angry emails.
The debt hasn't gone away. If anything, it’s gotten much, much worse. Alan Simpson might have been the "meanest" guy in the room, but the problems he was shouting about are now sitting on our doorstep.
The lesson here is simple. If we can't talk about the math without calling each other names, the math is eventually going to do the talking for us. And math doesn't care about our feelings or our generations. It just balances.
How to Stay Informed
You can track the current status of the Social Security Trust Fund through the Social Security Administration's annual reports. Staying ahead of the legislative changes is the only way to ensure your own "moment of truth" doesn't end in a fiscal disaster.