Aileen Wuornos: The Selling of a Serial Killer and the Real Story of Her Exploitation

Aileen Wuornos: The Selling of a Serial Killer and the Real Story of Her Exploitation

If you think you know the story of Aileen Wuornos because you watched Charlize Theron in Monster, you’re basically missing half the picture. The Hollywood version is tragic, sure. But the real-life documentary Aileen Wuornos: The Selling of a Serial Killer exposes something way more uncomfortable. It's not just a movie about a woman who killed seven men. It’s a film about how everyone around her—her lawyer, her "mother," and even the police—tried to turn her trauma into a paycheck.

Honestly, the documentary by Nick Broomfield is hard to watch. It’s gritty. It's low-budget. And it’s filled with people who look at a broken human being and see nothing but dollar signs.

What Really Happened in The Selling of a Serial Killer?

When Nick Broomfield arrived in Florida in the early 90s, he didn't find a mastermind. He found a circus. The documentary highlights a specific kind of rot that happens when true crime meets capitalism.

You've got Arlene Pralle, the "born-again Christian" who legally adopted Aileen while she was on death row. On camera, she talks a lot about Jesus. But she’s also the one managing Aileen’s "rights" and charging for interviews. Then there’s Steven Glazer, Aileen’s lawyer. This guy actually called himself "Dr. Legal." He was often filmed smoking a joint and seemed more interested in getting his face on TV than filing actual appeals.

It’s gross.

💡 You might also like: Songs by Tyler Childers: What Most People Get Wrong

Broomfield’s camera catches the awkward haggling over money. He shows how the Florida state police were allegedly trying to secure movie deals before the case was even closed. Think about that. The people responsible for justice were busy scouting for a producer.

The Tyria Moore Factor

A lot of people forget that Aileen didn't get caught because of some brilliant detective work. She got caught because her girlfriend, Tyria Moore, made a deal. Tyria cooperated with the police to get Aileen to confess on a wiretapped phone call.

In the documentary, you see the fallout of that betrayal. Aileen’s devotion to Tyria was intense—she literally confessed to save Tyria from being implicated. But the "selling" part didn't stop with the cops. Tyria herself was involved in selling her story to the media. Everyone was cashing out while Aileen was waiting to die.

Why Aileen Wuornos: The Selling of a Serial Killer Still Matters

This isn't just a 90s relic. It matters because it changed how we look at "America’s first female serial killer."

📖 Related: Questions From Black Card Revoked: The Culture Test That Might Just Get You Roasted

The media loved that label. It was catchy. It sold papers. But as Broomfield shows, Aileen was a deeply mentally ill woman who had been systemically abused since she was a toddler. She wasn't some "man-hating" predator in the way the headlines claimed. She was a homeless sex worker who finally snapped after a lifetime of being treated like garbage.

  • The Legal Incompetence: Steven Glazer encouraged her to plead "no contest" to several murders. This basically fast-tracked her execution.
  • The Mental Health Crisis: By the time Broomfield filmed his follow-up, Aileen: Life and Death of a Serial Killer, she was claiming the prison was using "sonic pressure" to control her brain.
  • The Execution: Despite her obvious psychosis, the state of Florida deemed her "of sound mind" enough to kill.

It raises a nasty question: Did we execute a serial killer, or did we execute a woman who had become a lucrative commodity for the state and the media?

Misconceptions About the Case

People often think Aileen was some kind of feminist vigilante. That’s a stretch. While her first victim, Richard Mallory, was a convicted rapist (a fact the court conveniently suppressed during the first trial), the subsequent victims weren't all monsters. Aileen herself admitted later that she killed for money and "out of hate."

But the documentary doesn't try to make her a hero. It just shows her as a person. A person who was being sold by the people she trusted most.

👉 See also: The Reality of Sex Movies From Africa: Censorship, Nollywood, and the Digital Underground

Actionable Insights: How to Watch and Learn

If you’re a true crime fan or a law student, you should treat this documentary as a case study in legal ethics and media bias.

  1. Watch the Pair: Don't just watch The Selling of a Serial Killer. You have to watch the 2003 follow-up, Aileen: Life and Death of a Serial Killer. The contrast between the two shows the rapid decline of her mental state.
  2. Research the "Williams Rule": This is the Florida law that allowed the prosecution to bring in evidence of her other murders during her first trial, which basically guaranteed a death sentence. It’s a controversial legal tactic worth understanding.
  3. Look for the Bias: When watching any true crime today, ask yourself: Who is profiting? Is the narrative being shaped by the people who want to sell a book or a streaming subscription?

The legacy of Aileen Wuornos isn't just the crimes she committed. It's the way the system—and we, the audience—consumed her.

To get the full picture, look into the transcripts of her final appeals. You'll see a woman who was done fighting, not because she was "at peace," but because she was tired of being a product. Read the actual reports on Richard Mallory’s history. It puts the "self-defense" claim in a much more complicated light than the prosecution ever allowed.