You’re staring at a graph with three different types of squiggly lines and a bunch of Latin words you can’t pronounce. Your heart rate is climbing. You’ve got 35 minutes to finish 40 questions, and honestly, it feels like the ACT is trying to prank you. If you’ve spent any time looking at ACT science practice questions, you know exactly what I’m talking about. It’s a sprint. It’s a scavenger hunt. It’s basically a test of how well you can stay calm while someone screams "Hurry up!" in your ear.
Here’s the weirdest part: you don't actually need to be a "science person" to ace this. I’ve seen students who sleep through AP Bio pull a 34, while straight-A chemistry students crumble. Why? Because this isn’t a science test. It’s a reading test with charts.
The Big Lie About ACT Science Practice Questions
Most people approach these questions like they’re studying for a mid-term. They try to memorize the periodic table or the stages of mitosis. Stop. That’s a waste of your brain space. According to the ACT’s own breakdown, only about 5% of the questions require outside knowledge. That’s maybe two questions per test. Everything else you need is right there on the page, buried in a pile of distracting data.
If you spend too much time reading the introductory text, you're dead in the water.
Seriously.
The scientists who write these passages love to use big, scary words like "phototropism" or "supernatant." They want you to get bogged down. They want you to feel small. But if you look at ACT science practice questions through the lens of a data analyst rather than a student, the whole thing changes. You aren’t there to learn. You’re there to find.
The "Locate, Compare, Predict" Method
When you’re working through a passage, you’re usually doing one of three things. First, you’re just finding a point on a graph. "What was the temperature at 10 minutes?" Easy. Second, you’re comparing two points. "Was Trial 2 higher or lower than Trial 1?" Still pretty simple. The third type—the one that trips people up—is the prediction. "If we ran the experiment for 20 minutes, what would likely happen?"
This is where students start overthinking. They try to apply some complex physics law they learned in 10th grade. Don't do that. Just look at the trend. If the line is going up, it’s probably going to keep going up. It’s not a trap; it’s just linear extrapolation.
Why Speed Kills (And How to Fix It)
You have about 52.5 seconds per question. Let that sink in. If you spend two minutes reading the background info on how soil pH affects tomato growth, you’ve already lost the game.
I’ve talked to tutors who suggest a "questions-first" approach. Don't even look at the passage. Go straight to question one. It might ask about Figure 1. Okay, go to Figure 1. Find the axis. Find the data point. Move on. It feels wrong—sorta like eating dessert before dinner—but it’s the only way to beat the clock.
Think about it this way: the ACT is a game of management. You have a limited supply of "focus points." If you spend all your points trying to understand the nuances of a cloud chamber experiment in the first passage, you’ll be a zombie by the time you hit the Conflicting Viewpoints section at the end.
Dealing with the "Fighting Scientists"
There is always one passage where two or three scientists argue about something like why the dinosaurs went extinct or whether a specific planet is habitable. This is the Conflicting Viewpoints passage. There are no graphs here. Just walls of text.
This is the one time you actually do have to read. But you’re not reading for "truth." You’re reading for "differences." Scientist 1 says it was a meteor. Scientist 2 says it was a volcano. When you tackle ACT science practice questions in this section, just look for the "but." "Scientist 1 believes X, but Scientist 2 argues Y." Focus on the points of contention. Usually, the questions ask what would support one scientist or weaken another. It’s a logic puzzle, nothing more.
The Trap of "Outside Knowledge"
Every once in a while, the ACT throws a curveball. They’ll ask a question about what a "neutral pH" is or which part of a cell produces energy. If you don't know it’s 7 or the mitochondria, you're stuck. But here’s the reality: these are rare.
I remember a student who spent three weeks memorizing every possible biology fact because he missed one question on a practice test about photosynthesis. He got a 36 on the science section, but he was so burnt out he bombed the math. Don't be that guy. If you run into a question that requires outside knowledge and you don't know it, guess and move on. The "B" or "G" bubble is your friend.
Real-World Examples of Data Misinterpretation
Let’s look at a common scenario in ACT science practice questions. You have a table showing the boiling point of various liquids at different altitudes.
The question asks: "Based on Table 1, as altitude increases, what happens to the boiling point?"
A student who knows a lot about science might start thinking about atmospheric pressure and vapor pressure. They might start second-guessing themselves. "Wait, is it a direct or inverse relationship? Does the pressure decrease or increase?" Meanwhile, the student who just looks at the table sees that as the "Altitude" column goes 0, 500, 1000, the "Boiling Point" column goes 100, 98, 96.
The numbers are going down. The answer is "decreases."
It’s that simple. The ACT is testing your ability to ignore the "noise" and focus on the "signal." Most of the text in a science passage is noise. The units (like mg, L, or m/s) are the signal. Pay attention to those units; they often tell you exactly where to look.
The Most Common Mistakes I See
- Misreading the axes: You’re looking at Figure 1, but the question is asking about Figure 2. Or you’re looking at the X-axis when you should be looking at the Y-axis.
- Ignoring the key: Some graphs have solid lines, dashed lines, and dotted lines. If you mix them up, you’re getting the question wrong, period.
- Over-complicating: If you find yourself doing complex mental math, you’re probably doing it wrong. The ACT Science section rarely requires anything beyond basic arithmetic.
- Panic: This is the big one. When people see a word they don't know, they freeze. If the passage is about "the thermal conductivity of anorthosite," just pretend the word "anorthosite" is "rock." It doesn't matter what it is. It only matters how it behaves in the experiment.
How to Actually Practice
Don't just do ACT science practice questions in a vacuum. You need to simulate the stress. Sit in a hard chair. Turn off your music. Put a timer for 35 minutes on your desk.
📖 Related: Simple Simon's Menu Riverside: What You Actually Need to Order
When you finish, the most important part isn't your score—it’s the "Why." Why did you miss question 14? Was it because you didn't understand the science? (Unlikely). Or was it because you misread the table? (Highly likely).
Keep a "Mistake Journal." It sounds dorky, but it works. Write down: "I missed a question because I didn't look at the legend on the graph." If you see that three times, you’ve just identified a pattern that’s costing you points.
Nuance and Complexity: It’s Not Just "Easy"
I don't want to make it sound like this is a walk in the park. It’s exhausting. The ACT Science section is the last section of a very long day. You’ve already done English, Math, and Reading. Your brain is essentially mush.
The complexity isn't in the material; it's in the endurance. That’s why your practice needs to focus on "triage." Some passages are just harder than others. If you hit a passage that looks like a nightmare—maybe it has five different tables and a bunch of chemical formulas—skip it. Do the other ones first. Bank the easy points. Then come back and fight the monster with whatever time you have left.
Actionable Steps for Your Next Practice Session
If you’re ready to actually improve your score, stop reading about the test and start doing it. But do it smarter.
First, take a full-length science practice section without a timer. Just see if you can get the questions right when you have all the time in the world. If you can’t get a 36 without a timer, you have a comprehension problem. If you get a 36 but it took you an hour, you have a speed problem.
Second, drill the "Locate" questions. Open a practice test and spend 10 minutes just finding data points as fast as you can. Don't even answer the full question; just find the value.
Third, learn the basic "ACT Science" lingo. Know what "direct relationship" (both go up) and "inverse relationship" (one goes up, one goes down) mean. Know that "independent variable" is what the scientists change and "dependent variable" is what they measure.
Lastly, trust the data. If the graph says the sky is green, then for the purpose of that question, the sky is green. Don't argue with the test. Just report what the squiggly lines are telling you.
Get a copy of the "Official ACT Prep Guide" (the big red book). It’s the only source of retired tests that actually reflect the current difficulty level. Most third-party books make the science section way too hard or focus too much on actual science facts, which just confuses you. Stick to the real stuff. Practice the "questions-first" strategy until it feels natural. You'll probably feel like you're rushing at first, and that's okay. Speed is a skill you have to build. Honestly, once you stop treating this like a science test and start treating it like a visual puzzle, your score will start to move.