Humans are obsessed with what hasn't happened yet. It’s a bit of a quirk. We spend billions on predictive modeling and trend forecasting, yet if you look back at the actual history of tomorrow, you’ll realize we’re mostly just guessing in the dark.
Take the 1939 World’s Fair in New York. People stood in massive lines to see "Futurama," an exhibit by General Motors that promised a 1960 filled with automated highways and teardrop-shaped cars. It looked amazing. It was sleek. But they didn't account for the social friction of the 1950s or the sheer logistical nightmare of rebuilding American infrastructure from scratch.
Prediction is hard.
We tend to overestimate what can happen in two years and underestimate what can happen in ten. This phenomenon, often called Amara’s Law after futurist Roy Amara, is the heartbeat of how we perceive the future. We get excited about a shiny new gadget, realize it’s buggy, get bored, and then—suddenly—it changes the entire world while we aren't looking.
The Victorian Version of the Year 2000
If you want to understand the history of tomorrow, you have to look at how people in the 1890s saw us. There’s a famous series of French postcards from that era called "En L'An 2000." They are hilarious. One shows a classroom where a teacher is literally grinding books into a machine that pumps the information directly into students' heads via wires.
They got the "instant information" part right. They just got the "wires in ears" part weirdly literal.
They also thought we’d have "aero-cabmen" picking us up in flying carriages. Instead, we have Uber drivers in 2015 Toyota Camrys. It’s less romantic but way more efficient. The disconnect usually happens because we project the present onto the future. We take the tech we have—like the telegraph or the steam engine—and just imagine a bigger, faster version of it. We rarely see the "black swan" events that change the rules of the game entirely.
Why the Jetpack Never Showed Up
Where is my jetpack? Honestly, people have been asking this since the 1950s. The Bell Rocket Belt actually existed in 1961. It worked! It could lift a person and fly them across a field. But it had a flight time of about 21 seconds and was incredibly loud and dangerous.
The history of tomorrow is littered with these "near misses."
- Nuclear everything: In the 1950s, Ford designed the Nucleon, a concept car powered by a small nuclear reactor in the trunk. Imagine the fender benders.
- Moving sidewalks: Early 20th-century planners thought entire cities would have conveyor belt streets. We got them in airports, and even there, people just stand still on them.
- Meal pills: Science fiction promised us a three-course dinner in a single capsule. Turns out, humans actually like chewing. We like the social ritual of eating.
This highlights a massive flaw in futurism: ignoring human psychology. We don't just want efficiency. We want comfort, status, and sensory experiences. Any vision of tomorrow that treats humans like logical robots is destined to fail.
📖 Related: Why Pics of Hurricanes From Space Still Blow Our Minds
The Digital Shift Nobody Predicted
By the 1970s, the "tomorrow" everyone talked about was space. 2001: A Space Odyssey suggested we’d have rotating space stations and lunar bases by the turn of the century. Instead, we got the internet.
We didn't go outward; we went inward.
The history of tomorrow shifted from physical hardware—faster planes, bigger buildings—to software and connectivity. In 1995, Newsweek published a now-infamous article by Clifford Stoll titled "The Internet? Bah!" He argued that no one would ever buy books or get news online because the internet was too clunky. He wasn't a luddite; he was a brilliant scientist. But he couldn't see the shift from "clunky tool" to "invisible utility."
Today, we see the same thing with AI and quantum computing. People are terrified or ecstatic, usually both. But the actual "tomorrow" of these techs likely won't be a robot uprising. It’ll probably be something boring and practical, like your fridge automatically negotiating the cheapest price for milk with a local warehouse.
Lessons from the Past for our Actual Future
So, how do we stop being wrong? Well, we probably can't. But studying the history of tomorrow teaches us a few things about what actually sticks.
Infrastructure is the biggest bottleneck. You can invent a flying car tomorrow, but without air traffic control for millions of vehicles and a way to stop them from falling on houses, it's just a hobby for billionaires. Regulation, social acceptance, and cost always move slower than invention.
Second, the future is usually "boring" once it arrives. The smartphone is a piece of technology that would have looked like dark magic to someone in 1950. To us? It’s a thing we use to look at memes while we’re on the bus. It’s mundane.
How to Evaluate Future Claims
If someone tells you "X" is the future, ask these three things:
💡 You might also like: Finding the Apple Store in Virginia Beach: What Most People Get Wrong
- Does it solve a human problem or just a technical one? (Google Glass failed because it made people look weird, not because the tech was bad.)
- Does it require a total rewrite of our laws? (Self-driving cars are stalled more by insurance and liability than by sensors.)
- Is it cheaper than what we have now? (Solar power took decades to explode because it needed to hit "grid parity" with coal. Once it did, the future arrived fast.)
Actionable Steps for Navigating What’s Next
Instead of getting swept up in the hype of every new "tomorrow," look for the quiet shifts.
- Watch the "un-cool" industries. Innovation in logistics, waste management, and energy storage usually impacts your daily life more than the latest social media app.
- Look for friction. Where is life still annoying? That's where the next real "tomorrow" is hiding.
- Invest in adaptability. Since we can't predict the specific tech of 2040, the best move is to learn how to learn. The history of tomorrow shows that the people who thrived weren't the ones who predicted the exact tool, but the ones who knew how to use it when it showed up.
The future isn't a destination we reach; it's just a series of "todays" that we haven't processed yet. Keep an eye on the fundamentals—energy, food, communication—and let the flying cars remain in the postcards.