Ever felt like the version of God you grew up with—that "old man in the sky" figure—just doesn't fit the modern world? You're definitely not the only one. Honestly, most of us treat the idea of God as this fixed, unchanging thing that either exists or doesn't. But Karen Armstrong basically flipped the script on that back in 1993.
Her book, A History of God, isn't some dry, dusty academic lecture. It’s a biography of an idea. It’s about how humans have literally reinvented God for 4,000 years to survive, find meaning, and deal with the messiness of being alive.
Karen Armstrong herself is a bit of a legend in the world of religious studies. She spent seven years as a Roman Catholic nun before leaving the convent in 1969. She went from being a devout believer to a staunch atheist, and eventually to what she calls a "freelance monotheist." That personal journey is what makes the book feel so authentic. She’s not trying to convert you. She’s just showing you the receipts of how we got here.
The Myth of the Unchanging God
One of the biggest misconceptions people have is that the "God of Abraham" has always been the same. Wrong.
In A History of God, Armstrong shows how the early Israelites weren’t even monotheists in the way we think today. They were "monolatrists." Basically, they believed other gods existed—like Baal or Asherah—but they chose to only worship Yahweh. It was a political and survival-based choice as much as a spiritual one.
Yahweh started out as a tribal war god. He was moody. He was jealous. He walked in gardens and got angry.
Then everything changed. When the Babylonians destroyed Jerusalem and dragged the elite into exile, the old "war god" wasn't enough anymore. How could he be powerful if his people lost? So, the prophets had to reimagine him. He became the only God, a universal power that transcended borders.
📖 Related: Double Sided Ribbon Satin: Why the Pro Crafters Always Reach for the Good Stuff
This is the core of Armstrong's argument: Religion is highly practical. If a concept of God doesn't help people live better or cope with their current reality, they eventually dump it. They have to.
The Axial Age Shift
Armstrong spends a lot of time on what she calls the Axial Age (roughly 800 to 200 BCE). This was a crazy time in history where, all across the globe, people started moving away from animal sacrifices and outward rituals toward "internal" spirituality.
- In India, you had the Upanishads and the Buddha.
- In Greece, Socrates and Plato were questioning everything.
- In the Middle East, the Hebrew prophets were screaming about social justice.
The takeaway? God stopped being someone you just "paid off" with a burnt goat. Instead, the divine became something linked to compassion. Armstrong argues that the real test of any religion isn't what you believe; it's how you treat people. If your "history of God" doesn't lead to more empathy, you're probably doing it wrong.
Why the "God of the Philosophers" Almost Ruined Everything
Ever wondered why theology feels so complicated and boring? You can blame the Greeks for that. Sorta.
When early Christians and Muslims started interacting with Greek philosophy, they tried to merge the "God of the Bible/Quran" with the "God of Aristotle." Aristotle’s God was the "Unmoved Mover"—totally remote, purely rational, and frankly, a bit of a cold fish.
Armstrong points out a massive tension here. You have a personal God who loves and gets angry, butting heads with a philosophical God who is an abstract principle. This clash gave us centuries of dense, confusing doctrines like the Trinity or complex Islamic falsafa.
👉 See also: Dining room layout ideas that actually work for real life
For many people, this "God of the Reason" felt empty. It led to a massive backlash that birthed the mystical traditions.
The Mystics: God as "Nothing"
This is where the book gets really wild. Armstrong highlights that the greatest thinkers in Judaism (Kabbalah), Christianity (like Meister Eckhart), and Islam (Sufism) eventually came to the same conclusion: God isn't a "being" at all.
They often described God as "Nothing" or "No-Thing." Not because God doesn't exist, but because God is so far beyond human language that calling him a "person" or a "thing" is actually an insult.
- Judaism: The Ein Sof is the infinite, unknowable essence of God.
- Islam: The Sufis talked about the "annihilation" of the self in the divine.
- Christianity: The "Cloud of Unknowing" suggested that we can only reach God by letting go of thoughts.
Honestly, these mystics were way more "modern" than we give them credit for. They weren't into literalism. They knew that religious language was just poetry trying to describe the indescribable.
The Modern Crisis: Is God Dead or Just Changing?
The final chapters of A History of God deal with the Enlightenment and the rise of atheism. Armstrong makes a really interesting point: the modern "God" that atheists like Richard Dawkins reject is actually a very recent invention.
In the 17th and 18th centuries, we started trying to "prove" God exists using science. We turned God into a "First Cause" or a "Great Clockmaker."
✨ Don't miss: Different Kinds of Dreads: What Your Stylist Probably Won't Tell You
The problem? Once you make God a scientific fact, he becomes vulnerable to scientific disproof. When Darwin and Newton came along, that version of God suddenly looked unnecessary.
Armstrong argues that we’ve lost the "art" of religion. We’ve become literalists. We think "faith" means "accepting certain facts as true," whereas for most of history, "faith" (or pistis in Greek) meant "trust" or "commitment" to a way of life.
Why this matters right now
We are currently living through another massive shift. Many people identify as "spiritual but not religious." They’re done with the dogma but still feel that "void."
Armstrong doesn't think God is gone. She thinks we are in a transition period. Just like the Israelites in Babylon or the mystics in the Middle Ages, we are currently "discarding" a version of God that doesn't work for us anymore.
The "God of Fundamentalism"—the one used to justify hate and exclusion—is, in her view, a "failed" version of the divine. It’s an idol. Real religion, according to the 4,000-year history she tracks, always moves toward transcendence and compassion.
Actionable Insights from Karen Armstrong's Work
If you’re looking to apply the lessons from A History of God to your own life or perspective, here are a few ways to start:
- Stop being a literalist. Whether you're a believer or an atheist, stop treating religious texts like science manuals. They were written as "mythos"—stories meant to provide meaning, not "logos" (logical facts).
- Focus on "Orthopraxy" over "Orthodoxy." Most religions for most of history cared more about how you acted (right practice) than what you thought (right belief). If your beliefs make you more judgmental, they're failing.
- Embrace the Silence. The mystics were onto something. Sometimes the best way to experience the "divine" (whatever that means to you) isn't through more words or songs, but through quiet reflection and letting go of the ego.
- Read the sources. If you're interested in this stuff, don't just take a summary's word for it. Look into the Upanishads, the Tao Te Ching, or the Sufi poets like Rumi. You’ll see the patterns Armstrong is talking about.
- Audit your "God." Ask yourself: "Is the version of 'the ultimate' I hold onto actually helping me be a better human?" If it’s just making you anxious or angry, it might be time for a personal "exile" and a reimagining.
Karen Armstrong's work reminds us that the "History of God" is really just the history of us. We are the ones who create these symbols, and we are the ones who have the power to change them when they no longer serve the cause of human flourishing.