Everyone thought they were a genius back in April. You probably sat there, staring at your laptop screen, running the 2024 nfl draft simulator for the fiftieth time, convinced that the Atlanta Falcons were definitely taking Dallas Turner at pick eight. It made too much sense. The simulator told you it was a 98% match. Then, the real draft happened, and Michael Penix Jr. walked across that stage, and the collective internet lost its mind.
That’s the thing about these simulators. They are addictive, incredibly detailed, and sometimes, completely disconnected from the chaotic reality of an NFL "war room."
What Most People Get Wrong About the 2024 nfl draft simulator
Most fans treat a draft simulator like a crystal ball. It isn't. Honestly, it's more like a highly advanced "Choose Your Own Adventure" book built on a mountain of spreadsheets. When you use a tool like the PFF Mock Draft Simulator or the Pro Football Network (PFN) version, you aren't seeing what will happen. You are seeing a mathematical average of what might happen based on "Big Boards" and "Team Needs."
🔗 Read more: Eagles vs Jaguars Score: What Really Happened at the Linc
Here is the kicker: simulators struggle with human ego.
A simulator doesn't know if a General Manager is terrified of losing his job and wants a "safe" pick, or if an owner has a weird obsession with a specific quarterback. In the 2024 cycle, the simulators were basically screaming that the Chicago Bears would take Caleb Williams first. That was the easy part. But once you got past the top three—Williams, Jayden Daniels, and Drake Maye—the logic started to fray.
Simulators largely missed the historic run on offensive players. We saw 14 straight offensive players go off the board to start the real 2024 draft. Most simulators, even the "smart" ones, kept trying to force defensive players like Quinyon Mitchell or Laiatu Latu into the top ten because, on paper, those teams "needed" defense. The reality? Teams were terrified of missing out on the next franchise tackle or wideout.
Why PFF and PFN Feel So Different
If you’ve spent any time in the draft community, you know the "PFF vs. PFN" debate is basically a civil war.
PFF (Pro Football Focus) uses their own proprietary grading system. Their simulator is notorious for being "stiff." If their analysts don't like a player, that player will tumble down your mock draft like a lead weight. For example, if PFF's big board had a low grade on a guy like Bo Nix, you could often snag him in the second round of their 2024 nfl draft simulator, even though the real Denver Broncos took him at twelve.
PFN, on the other hand, often felt a bit more "loose" with its trade logic. You could basically trade back twenty times, accumulate every third-round pick in the 2025 draft, and build a roster that would be impossible in real life. It’s fun. It's a blast, actually. But it’s not exactly a "simulator" at that point—it’s a sandbox game.
📖 Related: Rexall Place Edmonton AB Canada: What Really Happened to Gretzky's House
The Michael Penix Jr. Glitch
Let's talk about the elephant in the room. The Atlanta Falcons.
In almost every 2024 nfl draft simulator run prior to April 25, Michael Penix Jr. was a late first-round or early second-round value. If you were playing as the Falcons GM, the "suggested" picks were almost always:
- Dallas Turner (EDGE)
- Jared Verse (EDGE)
- Quinyon Mitchell (CB)
When the Falcons actually took Penix at eight, the simulators broke. This is a perfect example of why these tools have limitations. Simulators prioritize "Team Needs" based on the current roster. Since Atlanta had just signed Kirk Cousins to a massive $180 million deal, the algorithm assumed the "QB Need" was zero. It didn't account for a front office thinking three years down the line.
How the Big Boards Influence Your Mock
The "Big Board" is the soul of the simulator. Sites like NFL Mock Draft Database aggregate hundreds of boards from experts like Mel Kiper Jr., Daniel Jeremiah, and Dane Brugler.
- Consensus Boards: These average out everyone's opinion. They are usually the most "accurate" but also the most boring.
- Expert Specific Boards: If you use a simulator tied to a specific scout, you get their biases. If they love "high-ceiling" players, you'll see projects like Amarius Mims going way higher than a "high-floor" guy like Joe Alt.
In 2024, the consensus was that Marvin Harrison Jr. was the best non-QB in the draft. No simulator was ever going to let him slide past the Arizona Cardinals at four. That's where the tools actually get things right—the blue-chip prospects have a "gravity" that keeps them at the top.
Realism vs. "Winning" the Draft
The most common mistake? Trying to get an "A+" grade from the simulator.
Most 2024 nfl draft simulator tools give you a grade at the end. It's a dopamine hit. You see that green "A" and think you've outsmarted the league. But the grade is usually just a measure of how closely you followed the site's own rankings. If you "reach" for a player you love—say, taking Ricky Pearsall in the first round (which the 49ers actually did)—the simulator might give you a "D."
The 49ers didn't care about the grade. They wanted a specific skill set.
Trade Logic: The Great Fantasy
If you used the simulator to manage the New England Patriots, you probably tried to trade out of the number three pick. In the simulator, the Minnesota Vikings might offer you three first-round picks to move up for Drake Maye. In real life, those trades are incredibly tense, involve dozens of phone calls, and often fall apart over a single late-round pick swap.
✨ Don't miss: West Ham vs Bournemouth: Why This Fixture Always Feels Like Chaos
The 2024 nfl draft simulator makes trading look like a vending machine. You put in the value, you get the pick. But as we saw with the Giants and their pursuit of a QB, sometimes the team at the top just says "No," regardless of how much "value" you offer.
Why We Still Play With Them
Despite the inaccuracies, these tools are the best way to learn the roster of all 32 teams. Before I started using simulators, I couldn't tell you who the starting left guard for the Tennessee Titans was. After ten rounds of a 2024 nfl draft simulator, I knew exactly why they were desperate for JC Latham.
It turns the draft from a passive television event into an active puzzle. You start to see the connections. If the Chargers take Joe Alt, it changes what the Giants do, which changes what the Jets do. It’s a domino effect.
Actionable Tips for Your Next Sim
Stop trying to "win." If you want a realistic experience, try these constraints:
- No Trade-Backs: Only allow yourself one trade per draft. It forces you to make hard choices at your natural draft position.
- The "Reach" Rule: Force yourself to take one player at least 20 spots higher than the simulator suggests. Real GMs do this every single year.
- Draft for the Scheme: Don't just take the highest-ranked player. If your team runs a 3-4 defense, don't draft a 4-3 defensive end just because he's there.
The 2024 draft is in the books, but the lessons from the 2024 nfl draft simulator cycle apply every year. These tools are incredible for learning names and needs, but they can't predict the "Penix Picks" of the world. And honestly? That's why we watch. If a computer could perfectly simulate the draft, we wouldn't need to spend three days in April yelling at our TVs.
If you’re ready to dive back in for the next cycle, start by looking at the "Post-Draft" rosters. See where your favorite simulator was wrong and try to figure out why. Was it a missed medical? A bad character report? Or just a GM who saw something the spreadsheets didn't? That's where the real scouting begins.