Most people think Social Security started with FDR and the Great Depression. That’s wrong. By the time the United States finally got around to signing the Social Security Act in 1935, the concept was already a middle-aged veteran in Europe. If you really want to find the "birth" of this thing, you have to look back nearly 150 years to a guy who honestly hated the idea of socialism.
His name was Otto von Bismarck.
He was the "Iron Chancellor" of Germany, a man known for realpolitik and a pretty stiff mustache. In the 1880s, Germany was basically the wild west of the Industrial Revolution. Workers were getting chewed up by factory machines. Families were being dumped into poverty the moment a breadwinner got sick. Bismarck didn't create social insurance because he was a nice guy. He did it because he was terrified of a socialist revolution. He figured if the state gave people a reason to be loyal—a little bit of "bread for freedom"—they wouldn't burn the whole place down.
📖 Related: Ralphs Market Return Policy Explained (Simply)
The 1889 shockwave
Bismarck’s Old Age and Disability Insurance Bill of 1889 was the real game-changer. Imagine the 1880s for a second. There was no safety net. If you couldn't work, you starved or relied on the local "poor house," which was basically a prison for the destitute.
Bismarck’s system was weirdly familiar to what we have now. It was mandatory. It took money from the worker, the employer, and the government. It was a three-legged stool that actually stood up. But here is the kicker: the retirement age was set at 70.
Most people in 1889 didn't even live to be 70.
Life expectancy for a male born in 1850 was about 38 years. Think about that. The government was promising a pension that almost nobody would actually live long enough to collect. It was an actuarial masterstroke and a bit of a cynical joke all at once. It wasn't until 1916—well after Bismarck was dead—that Germany lowered the age to 65.
✨ Don't miss: The Ken Coleman Show: Why Most People Get Career Advice Wrong
150 years old social security: The American lag
While Europe was busy building these systems, the U.S. was basically ignoring the problem. Why? Because we had the Civil War pension system.
By 1893, Civil War pensions were eating up 41.5% of the entire federal budget. It was a massive de facto social security program, but it was only for Union veterans and their families. If you weren't a veteran, you were on your own.
Why the 1880s matter for your current paycheck
The DNA of 150 years old social security is still in your pay stub today. When you look at your FICA deduction, you're looking at a ghost from the 19th century.
- Compulsory participation: Bismarck knew that if it were optional, only the people who were already sick would sign up. The system would collapse.
- The payroll tax: This was a radical idea. Instead of taking money from general taxes, they took it directly from the work being done. It made people feel like they "earned" it, which is exactly why it’s so hard for politicians to cut it today.
- The disability link: From the very start, social security wasn't just about old age. It was about "invalidity." If a machine crushed your arm in a Prussian textile mill in 1884, you were the target audience.
Honestly, the transition from agrarian life to the city is what forced this. On a farm, you had an extended family. If Grandpa got too old to plow, he fed the chickens and lived in the back room. In a 19th-century city apartment? There was no back room. There were no chickens. There was only the wage. When the wage stopped, life stopped.
Myths that just won't die
You've probably heard that age 65 was chosen because that was Bismarck's age. It's a total myth. He was 74 when the 1889 law passed. He was long gone by the time 65 became the magic number. We use 65 (and now 67) mostly because we copied the Germans, who eventually copied the British.
Another big one: "Social Security is a savings account."
It never was. Not in 1889 and not now. It’s a "pay-as-you-go" system. The money coming out of your check today isn't sitting in a vault with your name on it; it’s being sent directly to a retiree in Florida or a disabled worker in Ohio. Bismarck designed it this way because it’s the only way to make the math work when you're starting from zero.
What happens next?
We are approaching a weird anniversary. As the concept of 150 years old social security matures, the math is getting harder. In the 1880s, there were dozens of workers for every one retiree. Today, that ratio is shrinking fast.
We’re living longer—way longer than the people Bismarck was planning for.
If you want to understand where the system is going, look at how it started. It has always been a compromise between "socialism" and "survival." It was never meant to make you rich; it was meant to keep you out of the poor house.
What you can actually do:
- Check your statement: Log into the SSA website. Don't assume the numbers are just "there." Verify your earnings history.
- Calculate the gap: Use a simple calculator to see what your benefit will actually cover. Usually, it's only about 40% of pre-retirement income.
- Diversify: The 150-year-old model of "government + employer + you" is leaning heavily on the "you" part lately. Roth IRAs and 401ks aren't just extras; they are the modern version of the back room on the farm.
The system isn't going to vanish, but it is going to change. It has been changing since 1889. The Iron Chancellor wouldn't recognize the modern world, but he’d definitely recognize the FICA tax.